Blog

  • Senior Friendly Restaurants

    Senior Friendly Restaurants

    Received April 29, 2026
    By Pamela Asplund

    PiddeG Mediterranean Eatery

    PiddeG is a fairly new Turkish/Mediterranean restaurant. After they opened I heard great things so I was happy to try it. The atmosphere is clean, quiet and bright. As you walk in you pass tempting Turkish delights which are beautiful as well as unusual and tasty. I’ve been back a few times and each time the food seems to get better. I must confess that Mediterranean food is one of my favorites, so I may be a little biased, although, this was my first experience with Turkish style dishes. 

    • Name: PiddeG
    • Address: 2979 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Walnut Creek, CA 94598
    • Distance from Rossmoor: 4.8 Miles
    • Phone Number: 925-433-2357
    • Website: piddeg.com
    • Takeout & Delivery: Yes
    • Hours: Monday-Thursday 11 AM-9PM, Friday 11AM-9:30 PM, Saturday 10:30 AM -9:30 PM, Sunday 10:30 AM-9 PM
    • Happy Hour: No
    • Bar: No
    • Ease of Parking: Easy. In the Whole Foods mall.
    • Noise: Low
    • Outside Seating: Yes, limited
    • Spice Level: Low
    • Individual Checks in Groups: Yes (you order and pay at the counter)
    • Price Range: $4.50-$19.00
    • Menu Items We Tried: Sampler Mezza plate, Lahmacun, Pidde cheese, Pidde 
    • beef/lamb, beet salad, Pidde entre salad, Kunefa, Baklava, and Turkish Delight

    Comments:  The food does not disappoint. The Sampler Mezza plate is a must have.      

    It’s why I like to come here with a few people. Each item on the plate is packed with flavor and the combinations are great together. The flat-bread that accompanies it is a perfect compliment. The Lahmacun and Piddies are like Mediterranean pizza and flat bread and perfect for sharing. The beet salad was a flavorful add on. The entree Pidde salad had a generous portion of meat and was very satisfying and flavorful. I am not usually a fan of Baklava but was happy to find it tender and not overly sweet. The

    Kunefa was a surprise and like eating a sweet cheese pudding, not at all like a cheese cake. I’m sorry but this is not a good place for a diet. Each person I’ve brought here has returned on their own.

    Thank you to all that gave me feedback on our reviews. It was rewarding to find out that they were actually being read and helping people. It gives us motivation to continue. Feedback and suggestions are always welcomed at xadelphi@yahoo.com.

  • Barry Brian’s Presentation to the RWC Board – Member’s Forum Statement April 30, 2026

    Barry Brian’s Presentation to the RWC Board – Member’s Forum Statement April 30, 2026

    Good morning. Thank you to all of the Board members, and especially Mary & Carol, for your service.

    I’m here on behalf of the more than 1,000 Rossmoor residents who signed the Gateway petition.

    On March 26, I sent the Board a detailed petition report with four specific requests. I received an acknowledgment but no substantive Board response. On April 28, I sent a second request. Two hours later, Mr. Matheson responded. That response helpfully describes the ELS process and upcoming events, and we appreciate the information. But it does not fulfill what was asked.

    The petition asked the Board — not management — to formally commit to: upstream programming studies on how technology can reduce headcount; evaluation criteria developed with resident input; genuine consideration of resident-generated alternatives; and ongoing community engagement at every stage. The GM’s response addresses none of these four requests directly.

    There is also the matter of executive sessions. Under Davis-Stirling, which applies to RWC as affirmed in GRF v. Franz, executive sessions are limited to litigation, personnel, contracts, and member discipline. Space planning deliberations belong in open session.

    What residents are asking for is simple: a direct, on-the-record Board response to their petition. Not a description of what ELS is doing — but a statement, from this Board, that it has heard its members, and that their four requests will be taken seriously. That is what responsive governance looks like. Thank you.

  • Nan Warren Candidate Statement

    Nan Warren Candidate Statement

    NAN WARREN 2130 Cactus Court #4

    I’m Nan Warren, a dedicated Rossmoor resident proud to serve as director of Third Walnut Creek Mutual for the past 6½ years.

    While on the Third Mutual board, I have served as vice president, president and chair of multiple committees. This hands-on experience taught me Rossmoor’s inner workings: setting policies, managing budgets and addressing resident needs for our large mutual (1,100-plus manors). I’ve led committees to resolve maintenance issues and enhance services – skills I’ll bring to the RWC Board.

    Key RWC challenges ahead:

    • Improving transportation for non-drivers;
    • Resolving the Public Works office issue;
    • Improving meeting space allocation for Rossmoor clubs;
    • Significantly reducing our coupon growth rate;
    • Attracting new residents. All require effective Board leadership. I will collaborate with fellow Board members on practical solutions, drawing from my 20 years managing a large architectural firm and leadership on Read continuation of RWC Board candidate statements Read continuation of RWC Board candidate statements RWC: volunteer boards including John Muir Hospital Foundation, California Association of Independent Schools, Fine Arts Museums of SF (East Bay Auxiliary), and Head Royce School.

    I will also advocate strongly for listening to Rossmoor residents and RWC staff, ensuring solutions reflect our collective best thinking.

    Vote for my experience and commitment. Thank you!

  • Robert Shiau Candidate Statement

    Robert Shiau Candidate Statement

    ROBERT SHIAU 2605 Saklan Indian Drive #4

    My name is Robert Shiau, and I am seeking your vote to represent District H on the Rossmoor Walnut Creek Board.

    I was born in Taiwan and came to the United States to pursue graduate studies. I earned a master’s degree in electrical engineering from Duke University and spent more than 30 years working in the technology industry, including with companies such as Raytheon and Northrop Grumman. During my career I developed strong analytical skills to identify and solve complex problems, published technical work and was granted three U.S. patents.

    After completing a master’s degree in Christian studies, I served as a pastor for a Chinese church in Massachusetts until my retirement. I moved to Rossmoor in 2016 and currently serve as a Chinese pastor for the Rossmoor Chinese Christian Community Church, preaching once a month at Creekside.

    I have lived in Rossmoor for nearly 10 years and have been active in several community organizations including pickleball, Art Association, Chinese American Association and church groups.

    Rossmoor is a wonderful community, but we face important challenges. If elected, I will focus on four priorities:

    1. Room reservations are currently limiting many clubs’ growth. I believe that some room reservation difficulties can be solved by readily available software.
    2. We need to ensure that major capital projects are supported by clear analysis, realistic cost projections, environmental considerations and competitive bidding.
    3. As your District H director, I shall attend Mutual meetings regularly to collect resident feedback.
    4. Maintaining proper Board oversight of and independence from RWC staff. With a combination of engineering discipline and a commitment to community service, I believe I can help Rossmoor continue to thrive. I respectfully ask for your vote for District H Director to the RWC Board.
  • Sara Spence  Candiate Statement

    Sara Spence  Candiate Statement

    SARA SPENCE 1200 Canyonwood Court #2

    I lived in Milwaukee from college graduation until my husband, Ian Harris, and I moved here in 2010. I earned a master’s in educational psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and worked in early childhood education programs and health and social agencies. I served as staff, administration and as a board member in a variety of nonprofit organizations, where I learned leadership skills, nonprofit management and group process. I also worked for Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-Milwaukee) in the district office.

    When I arrived, I joined the Trails Club, the Ceramic Arts Club and the Boomers. I served as president of the Ceramic Arts Club from 2014 to 2017, during which time I organized the arts studios around the Gateway Plaza to ask for and receive updating.

    In 2019, my husband was diagnosed with Parkinson’s. I cared for him at home until he died in May 2023. Currently, I am a member of the Democrats of Rossmoor, the Rossmoor Art Association, the Rossmoor Duplicate Bridge Club and the Volunteer Exchange.

    Recently, with the decision to build new pickleball courts, the Board has provided an amenity to attract younger residents. Now the Board needs to pay attention to the needs of the older residents by providing viable transportation services. This makes all residents safer by offering a reliable way to get around for residents who should give up driving.

    I love living in Rossmoor. As a younger resident I enjoyed a variety of activities with interesting people. As a caregiver I found emotional and physical support. Now I would like to give back by serving as a Rossmoor Walnut Creek Board member. I hope you will give me that opportunity.

    Thank you.

  • Rossmoor Life Council Endorsements

    Rossmoor Life Council Endorsements

    2026 RWC Board Election

    The RLC Steering Committee has evaluated all RWC Board candidates through individual interviews and other data collection methods. We enthusiastically endorse the following slate because each candidate shares RLC’s commitment to resident-centered governance and is prepared to address two pressing community needs: meaningful Board Management responsiveness to residents (starting with the Gateway Building C decision), and improved local transportation, especially for our mobility-impaired residents.

    RLC Steering Committee’s Recommended Slate

    DISTRICT E Sara Spence  (414) 507-5507
    Running unopposed

    Read Candidate Statement

    DISTRICT H Robert Shiau  (520) 238-1415
    One other candidate running

    Read Candidate Statement

    DISTRICT I Nan Warren  (415) 601-8240
    Two other candidates running

    Read Candidate Statement


    Rossmoor Life Council Steering Committee

    Barry Brian, Joe Hoffman, Dave Kosters, Jude Levine, Chuck Sanderson, Ron Snyder, C.S. Wang, Mindy Zuckerman

  • Top-Line Results From the March 2026 Resident Survey

    Top-Line Results From the March 2026 Resident Survey

    Rossmoor Life Council – March 2026 Survey Results

    Rossmoor Life Council

    Resident Advocacy Group

    Dear Rossmoor Residents,

    The Rossmoor Life Council (RLC) is pleased to share the results of our Second Assessment of Life at Rossmoor, conducted in March 2026. This survey gives residents a collective voice on the topics that matter most to daily life here — and gives our RWC Board of Directors actionable, resident-generated data to guide community decisions.

    What We Found: Top-Line Results From the March 2026 Resident Survey

    🟢 Strongest Satisfaction

    Clubs (85%)

    Safety (82%)

    Shared Facilities (76%)

    Communications (75%)

    🔴 Areas Needing Attention

    Board Decisions & Oversight (50% Dissatisfied)

    Transportation (42% Dissatisfied)

    Management Responsiveness (40% Dissatisfied)

    Getting My Voice Heard (35% Dissatisfied)

    How 2026 Compares to 2024

    A valuable feature of surveys like this is the ability to track change over time. The number of residents participating in our September 2024 and March 2026 surveys was nearly identical (approximately 360 responses received for each), and the areas the surveys asked about matched nicely.

    However, we want to point out some differences in these two surveys that should be kept in mind when viewing the comparison:

    •  The questions in our 2024 survey were worded somewhat differently (see links to the survey data below for the actual survey questions).

    •  In 2024, RLC’s resident contact list was only about 25% as large as our current contact list (approximately 5,000 email addresses). In 2024 we sent the survey to everyone in our contact list and in 2026 we sent the survey to a random sample (less than 2,000 residents) from our contact list. Our 2026 sampling and non-responder follow-up methods significantly reduced selection bias and some other potential bias issues in the 2026 survey that were not addressed in 2024.

    With the above caveats in mind, here is the comparison between the 2026 and 2024 survey findings:

    1.  Board Decisions & Oversight — largest decline. Negative sentiment rose from approximately 28% (2024) to 50% (2026) — the largest single shift between the two surveys, and an area warranting priority Board attention.

    2.  Staff Customer Service — most improved. Positive ratings rose from 46% to 65%, a meaningful 19-point gain that suggests progress in front-line service delivery.

    3.  Communications improved. Positive ratings rose approximately 10 points, possibly reflecting improvements to the Rossmoor News and other resident channels.

    4.  Confidence in community improvement trajectory declined sharply. In 2024, 82% of respondents agreed Rossmoor was improving each year. By 2026, only 35% were satisfied with community improvement progress.

    5.  Safety remains the top-rated topic in both surveys, though dissatisfaction increased slightly from approximately 3% to 10%.

    6.  Transportation is a significant concern — 42% dissatisfied in 2026 — and warrants priority attention from the Board and Management. (The 2024 survey did not ask a specific question about Rossmoor transportation.)

    7.  Resident voice concerns deepened. Negative sentiment on “Getting My Voice Heard” rose from approximately 28% to 35%.

    About This Survey

    To maximize representativeness, survey invitations were randomized from the largest available email list of Rossmoor residents, drawn from public sources including voter rolls.

    Total survey email invitations sent: 1,995 (sent on 3/27/26)

    Follow-up email reminders sent to non-responders: 1,776 (sent on 3/31/26)

    Survey design: 95% confidence level; 5% margin of error; target sample = 370

    Total responses received: 360

    As with any survey, results reflect the views of those who responded; respondents are somewhat more likely to be registered voters and email users than the broader community. Despite this, the data provides valuable insight that would be difficult and expensive to obtain by other means. Resident quotes included in the linked materials were drawn from open-ended responses and lightly edited for length and clarity.

    Full results, including pie charts and resident comments, are available via the links below.

    •  View Pie Chart Summary for 2026 and 2024

    •  Read Resident Comments Digest and Quotes; 2024 Qs

    Call to Action

    For all residents:

    •  Review the findings and share them with your neighbors. (This email is being sent to about 5,000 residents, so a significant number of your neighbors will not receive it because we don’t have their contact information.)
    •  Write your Board representative to share your views on the areas of greatest concern — particularly Board decision-making and transportation.
    •  Consider attending the May 11 (9:30 a.m. in Peacock Hall) annual Members Meeting and speaking during the Member Forum portion of that meeting about priorities you would like the new RWC Board to focus on.

    For residents in Districts H & I:

    •  Please consider these findings when deciding which candidates to vote for.

    For the RWC Board of Directors:

    •  We respectfully ask that the Board review these findings and publicly commit to addressing the improvement areas residents have identified, with priority on (1) the perception that the Board too often doesn’t represent resident interests and (2) resident transportation needs are not being met.
    •  We invite the Board to engage directly with the Rossmoor Life Council on next steps.

    About the Rossmoor Life Council

    The Rossmoor Life Council is an independent, resident-led advocacy organization working to ensure that resident voices are heard in community governance.

    •  Learn more about the Rossmoor Life Council
    •  Join the Rossmoor Life Council

    Questions or feedback? Contact us at news@rossmoorlife.org

    Regards,

    Rossmoor Life Council Steering Committee

    Barry Brian, Joe Hoffman, Dave Kosters, Jude Levine,
    Chuck Sanderson, Ron Snyder, C.S. Wang, Mindy Zuckerman


    Rossmoor Life Council • 1966 Tice Valley Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA 94595

    Click here if you no longer wish to receive messages from the Rossmoor Life Council.

  • Previous Projects List

    Previous Projects List

    A list of TLC’s Projects and Project Status

    Project NameProject LeaderProject Status
    Room ReservationsJoe Hoffman
    Alcohol LicensingDan Ring/Denise Schmidt
    GRF Documents ReviewMary England
    Weekend TransportationBarry Brian
    RV Lot FeesDennis Rosenblitt
    RLC Resident SurveysBarry Brian/Dave KostersSep 2024 (general satisfaction); Jan 2025 (issues), Mar 2025 (room reservations), more to follow
    RLC as “Recognized Org”Mary England Initial application denied; follow-up meeting unsuccessful; finalizing written appeal
    RLC WebsiteCarl BrownWebsite is up the code is complete and we are waiting on data and reports

  • About RLC

    About RLC

    What is the Rossmoor Life Council?

    The Rossmoor Life Council (RLC) was formed in September 2024. Its mission is ongoing enhancement of the quality of life at Rossmoor by increasing accountability, responsiveness, and the effectiveness of what is delivered to Rossmoor’s residents. RLC’s current membership stands at 146 Rossmoor residents, including former mutual, GRF Board, and club presidents and officers. We are seeking to increase resident engagement and influence in major decisions affecting Rossmoor life. A recent example is the significant policy and administrative changes associated with room reservations and room utilization.

    In addition to focusing on a limited set of priorities (such as room reservations), RLC has a vision for resident engagement that we hope will resonate with others.

    “Is this contemplated change in fees/procedure/policy in the best long-term interest of Rossmoor’s residents?”

    Feedback Tools and Improvement Opportunities

    RLC’s recent poll of several hundred residents suggests that at present, many believe how well resident needs are being met by GRF’s board and management could be significantly improved. We currently have multiple ways for residents to communicate their needs, including Resident Forums in the Rossmoor News, at GRF committee meetings, at GRF Board meetings, and through a generous willingness of GRF management to meet with resident individuals and groups. RLC intends to enhance the clarity and efficiency of the information flow to the GRF Board and management via tools such as selective resident surveys, advisory panels of resident experts in selected areas, benchmarking studies with other active adult communities, and other strategies.

    RLC is Not Presently a “Recognized Organization” by GRF

    GRF’s General Manager and the GRF Board President concluded last December that RLC should not be allowed, at least for now, to be recognized as a Rossmoor Organization.

    RLC Vision Statement

  • The GRF Board 2025 Election

    The GRF Board 2025 Election

    The candidates running for the GRF Board this spring are Janet Seldon in District B; Susan Hildreth and Cheryl Hines in District F; and Adrian Byram in District G. Seldon and Byram are running unopposed, so they will be elected by acclamation.
    Candidates’ statements and ballots will be mailed to members of District F on Friday, April 11 and must be returned to the auditors by close of business on Thursday, May 1.

    The ballots will be counted by GRF’s election inspection company, and the results will be reported on Friday, May 2.

    The new and re-elected Board members will be seated on the Board at the organizational meeting following its GRF Annual Meeting of Members on Monday, May 12 at 9:30 p.m. in Peacock Hall at Gateway Complex and over Zoom.